Skip to content

Projects & Access

2 min read

The Projects settings section helps you review how access is configured across workspace projects.

This view is for workspace-level access review. Use the main workspace Projects page when you want to open or create projects.


The section summarizes:

  • Total projects
  • Projects with direct users
  • Projects with groups
  • Projects with no direct users
  • Projects with no groups
  • Projects with hybrid coverage

These metrics help you find projects that may need access review.


Each project receives an access mix label:

  • Direct: direct users are assigned
  • Grouped: access comes through groups
  • Hybrid: both direct users and groups are assigned
  • Unassigned: no access is configured

Hybrid coverage is often useful when a project needs both team-based access and individual exceptions.


A toolbar above the list helps you find projects quickly. Search matches project name, ID, code, and description.

You can filter by:

  • Access coverage
  • User coverage
  • Group coverage

You can sort by:

  • Project name
  • Direct user count
  • Group count
  • Attention first

Projects are listed in a sortable table. Each row shows:

  • Project name, with its project code
  • Project ID
  • Access mix (Direct, Grouped, Hybrid, or Unassigned)
  • Direct user count
  • Group count
  • An Attention flag when access needs review
  • An action to open the project

Click a sortable column header — Project, Direct users, Groups, or Attention — to sort by it. Column sorting stays in step with the Sort by control in the toolbar.

Expand a row (use the chevron, or click the row) to reveal that project’s:

  • Description, project ID (with a copy action), and project code
  • Direct users — each direct user with their project role
  • Groups — each group with its project role

Use the open action on a row to open the project in a new tab.


Projects may show Attention needed when access should be reviewed.

Common reasons include:

  • No access configured
  • No direct users
  • No groups
  • Many direct users
  • Access that is mostly direct instead of group-based